Expressing Precision and Bias in Calorimetry

Year
2010
Author(s)
David S. Bracken - Los Alamos National Laboratory
Stephen Croft - Los Alamos National Laboratory
Danielle K. Hauck - Los Alamos National Laboratory
Abstract
The calibration and calibration verification of a nuclear calorimeter represents a substantial investment of time in part because a single calorimeter measurement takes of the order of 2h to 24h to complete. The time to complete a measurement generally increases with the size of the calorimeter measurement well. It is therefore important to plan the sequence of measurements rather carefully so as to cover the dynamic range and achieve the required accuracy within a reasonable time frame. This work will discuss how calibrations and their verification has been done in the past and what we consider to be good general practice in this regard. A proposed approach to calibration and calibration verification is presented which, in the final analysis, makes use of all the available data – both calibration and verification collectively - in order to obtain the best (in a best fit sense) possible calibration.